19 September 2008, 10:30-11:05
Applying Physics at our Service: Climate Change: Why Gender Matters
Mainstreaming Gender into the International Climate Change Negotiations
Ulrike Röhr, Head of genanet – focal point gender, environment, sustainability, Berlin
Unlike most of the United Nations conventions in the last decade, the Framework Convention on Climate Change has failed to adopt a gender-sensitive strategy, nor is it addressing women as stakeholders or persons affected. Same applies to the Kyoto Protocol, a specific agreement to the convention, which was developed to create concrete targets, policies and monitoring mechanisms. The missing link to gender equality in the decisions hampers to call attention to gender impacts of climate change policy, in particular because social aspects in general are marginalized in the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol. This failure of integrating gender results in shortcomings in the efficiency and effectiveness of climate related measures and instruments.
Due to this situation, women’s organizations involvement in the annual Conferences of the Parties (COP) to the UNFCCC was poor in recent years, although there was a promising start during the first COP 1995 in Berlin. After a period of low participation, women’s groups have picked up the strands again since 2002, holding side events, distributing statements, hosting exhibition booths, discussing gender issues with delegations, and convening Women’s Caucuses.
After some years of persistence and competing for attention, at COP13 in Bali (2007), from a gender perspective a significant breakthrough was achieved. For the first time in UNFCCC history, a world wide network of women, gendercc – women for climate justice, was established. The group published several position papers articulating the women and gender perspectives on the most pressing issues under negotiation. The papers are addressing the Post-Kyoto-Negotiations, financing climate change adaptation and mitigation, prevention of deforestation, agrofuels or nuclear energy from a gender perspective. They are criticizing the uni-dimensional and exclusive focus of the climate change debates to technical and market based solutions to mitigate climate change which don’t apply to sustainable development, and demand of the integration gender analysis in the review and further development of the mechanisms as well as for strong criteria to ensure women’s benefits from funds set up to support adaptation to climate change in developing countries.
A range of activities on women’s and gender issues was organized during COP13 by various organizations and institutions. And they met with interest, increasing awareness, and increased expression of commitment to gender justice from a number of stakeholders.
In the future, similar efforts must be undertaken related to the process and institutional arrangements. Continuous representation of women and the gendercc network will be crucial. On the other hand, in order to prepare substantial input into the meetings, it is necessary to link discussions at local levels to those at the international level – feeding local realities and experiences into the general and abstract discussions at the global level, as well as ‘translating’ global changes and international policies so as to communicate what these will, or may, mean for local communities. Providing capacity development opportunities for women and gender activities who are prepared to raise their voices in the international policy arena will be key, so that they can become effective advocates on policy and effective communicators to communities and networks around the world.
The activities in Bali paved the way for implementing gender mainstreaming into the Post-Kyoto-Negotiations, which are planned to be finalized at COP15 in Copenhagen in December 2009. An intermediate step will be undertaken at the next conference to be held in Poznan in December 2008: the network is planning for a parallel conference aiming to discuss concrete demands and recommendations for the negotiation texts.